Information Regulator on judgement of Constitutional Court in favour of transparency

The Information Regulator (Regulator) welcomes the judgment in the matter of Arena Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Other v SARS and Others by the Constitutional Court which was handed down yesterday, 30 May 2023. This judgment confirms the declaration made by the North Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) that sections 35 and 46 of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (PAIA) as well as sections 67 and 69 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (TAA) are constitutionally invalid, in so far as they prevent access to tax records by a person other than the taxpayer.

This follows the PAIA request by Arena Holdings and Amabungane Centre for Investigative Journalism to SARS to access the Former President Mr Jacob Zuma’s tax records which were refused in March 2019. SARS refused access to the records on the basis that he is entitled to confidentiality as per sections 34 (1) and 35 (1) of PAIA as well as section 69 (1) of TTA.

The Regulator has a constitutional mandate to promote and protect the right of access to information, and the right to privacy as it pertains to the protection of personal information. The Regulator recognises the importance of one’s right to privacy, however, this right must be balanced against other rights, in particular the right of access to information.

The Regulator was cited as one of the respondents in this case and made submissions to the Constitutional Court that while section 35 of PAIA prohibits tax records from ever being released, this section must be read in the context of the right to transparency. This was to assist the Constitutional Court with its decision.

The Regulator welcomes the order directing Parliament to address the constitutional invalidity within the stipulated period. “This order will ensure that section 46 of PAIA is amended to include tax records in the category of records which must be disclosed if such disclosure would reveal evidence of a contravention of, or failure to comply with the law and the disclosure is in the public interest,” said Chairperson of Regulator, Adv. Pansy Tlakula. The judgment goes a long way in promoting transparency by public bodies and public officials and will strengthen the constitutional right of access to information.

Source: Government of South Africa

Related Articles